Friday, 18 January 2013

LO3: Mindmap of Original Idea

-->
My Idea:
-        Abusive Relationships
Questions to Ask:
-        Has an early jump into relationships created a fire back?
-        What caused the abuse within your relationship?
-        How did you originally feel about the relationship before you suffered from it?
-        Do you have any advice to give individuals, suffering in an abusive relationship?
Interviewees:
-        Husband & wife
-        Boyfriend & girlfriend
-        Parents/Guardian & children
-        Brothers & sisters
-        Enemies
-        Victims & criminals
Background & Culture:
-        Individuals from diverse culture and backgrounds

Gulshan’s Idea:
v  Arranged Marriages
Questions to Ask:
v  Are arranged marriages successful?
v  How long did your relationship last?
v  Do you think arranged marriages work out better?
v  Would it be useful if your parents arranged your marriage or would you find a partner yourself?
Interviewees:
v  Married people
v  Students


Palvi’s Idea:
§  Freedom Within School
Questions to Ask:
§  How does it feel to not be allowed out of school during lunchtime and break times?
§  Do you feel your institution treats you like a young adult?
§  Are you responsible for your own actions?
§  Why do you think the school does not give you any freedom?
§  How would you like to be treated in sixth form?
§  Do you get freedom at home?
§  Compare your freedom at home to your school life
§  Do you like the old school rules of the new academy rules?
§  Do you have any restrictions at home?
Interviewees:
§  Sixth formers
§  Ex sixth formers
§  Teachers

After our meeting on 11t January 2013, me, Palvi and Gulshan sat and pitched our ideas to one another.

Friday, 11 January 2013

LO2: Compare and Contrasting Two Documentaries




Compare and Contrasting Two Documentaries


During this assignment I will be covering elements, such as accuracy, balance, impartiality, objectivity and subjectivity, opinion, access and contracts with the viewer, relating to my two chosen documentaries. First of the two documentaries which I will be analysing is a channel 4 documentary called, Stalked and the second documentary is called One Born Every Minute. Through my analysis I will also be discussing features such as actuality, voice over, interviews, archival footage, montage, exposition and more so.



Documentary: Stalked

Stalked is a documentary, based on a real life event, which relates to a writer’s life and how it changed when a female stalker invaded his life. Pete, the victim, in this documentary reveals his experience of a horrifying incident, through the cause of social networking sites, which almost put his life in jeopardy.

Pete’s real life example, of his female stalker, Karen was completely a bias view. Within it, there was no balance between his story and the story of the stalkers. The documentary was solely based on him. However, a lot of interviews with friends, colleagues, witnesses and the victim itself have been used intensively throughout this. Therefore I can say that the documentary can be believed, despite the fact that it is a subjective piece of material. The views, opinions and thoughts are entirely related to the subject matter, in this case, Pete.

Family, friends, victims, colleagues and witnesses all speak the similar stories throughout the documentary, which emphasises the fact that the victim, on whom this is based upon, is most likely to be speaking the truth. Pete’s family, have also displayed photographs and letters, from the stalker, to the camera, supporting the case.

Before the actual beginning of the documentary, a warning/message is displayed on the screen. This message alerts the audience that the reconstruction following has been acted out by another actor, rather than the genuine stalker. The message displayed appears as it has been entered using a type writer, and to emphasise this, diegetic sound has been used. Diegetic sound, such as voices have been used, to flow with the piece of art and to make it seem realistic, almost as in the shoes of the victim.

The type writer introduction causes a nerve-racking feeling and sets a serious atmosphere followed by the sound, of a woman running in high heels. This type of sound emphasises the start of a chase. It persuades the reader to carry on watching through its exposition and montage at the beginning. First few minutes are very important of an episode/movie, as this either attracts or puts the audience off. But looking at this movie, it has snatched the audience’s attention, so that it is more focused on the documentary, and keen on watching it.

Editors of this documentary have used reconstruction, diegetic sound and early message warning signs to prepare the viewers and also to build the suspense and cause and adrenaline feel. This is because the issue that they are relating to is a sensitive topic and very few people would freely express this. However, it is also to create a boundary of warmth feelings, so that others in a similar situation can relate to it; causing a sense of belonging.

During the montage, there is a structure sequel of various sections of the reconstruction throughout the beginning of the documentary. This gives and overall view of the bigger picture, later on. However, there are parts of this documentary which are sensitive to the victim and for the audience there may be aspects which are not smooth for viewers with heart problems. But this issue has not been mentioned at the start, as it may reduce the size of the people watching it.

Nevertheless, this documentary is likely to be accurate, as the images and clips have been recorded over a two year period, making this a longitudinal study. However despite noting this, there is only one side to the story and hence the period of two years has not been utilised correctly and makes this a very bias material. However, if the documentary represented two sides of the story, it would then allow the audience to make the decision of who they think is right and who they think is lying.

Summary of Stalked

Stalked, is a documentary which includes a variety of features, such as images, reconstruction, interviews and experts, nonetheless it has much more to provide. It is quite private, as it does not reveal too much, but it just briefly describes what, how, where and when this all happened. The main question which this documentary does not answer is that “why did the female stalk Pete in the first place?” This then becomes a rhetorical question, which the audience will end up asking themselves, yet will never find the answer.

Although, it has some strong elements to it, it has a lot more potential, as it can deliver more than expected. As a whole the documentary is very appealing and definitely interesting. At peaks, as the audience you want to see more of the reconstruction as it has a greater impact and also impersonates any real life scenarios.

Overall, I would recommend this documentary however; I believe that it has a lot more to provide to the audience, than what it has actually given. It does create a contract with the viewer, but in order to improve, it needs both sides to the situation not just the one.

Documentary: One Born Every Minute

One Born Every Minute is a British reality television programme which shows captured videos of women, giving childbirth, within a hospital ward. There have been three television series, of this reality documentary, up till date, in the United Kingdom, which is aired on Channel 4. This documentary, unlike Stalked, has a positive outlook on life, despite both are based on reality. The main purpose of this documentary is to appeal to pregnant women and their spouses or mothers-to-be; however this can also be watched for entertainment purposes, due to the situations individuals face.

In the opening minutes of this documentary, the montage has already set the scene. Producers have done this by shooting a close up of the hospital information board, on which it states the delivery suite. By doing this, the audience is already into the location of this documentary. Usually, cameramen take establishing shots to set the scene, however for this documentary the production team allows the audience to use logical understanding to put together the location of this series.

Other than close ups of the setting, there has also a lot of close up shots used within the first eleven seconds, into the documentary, alongside diegetic sounds of women screaming in the background and clocks ticking. The diegetic sounds used within the beginning of this documentary are to set a solid scene, from what they have already seen. Also the ticking of the clocks implies the effect of how midwives, nurses and doctors at the institute are fighting against the clock to save and help the birth of new lives.

As there are about forty or so cameras, set up in the hospital before the shooting of this documentary, Channel 4, allows us to see real archival footage of women before, during and after their birth, which gives a deeper insight into the real meanings of everyday life. Also, having this many cameras means that editors can pick and choose what will appeal to the audience, before broadcasting it, and also means that consent has been taken from the people being recorded. There is not deceit regarding the filming and the interviewers and mothers have given permission for the camera team to access some private and personal issues. In addition to this, permission has also been asked from the hospital itself before the proceeding of the recordings, or otherwise they wouldn’t have been allowed to record footage.

This documentary allows almost any mature women to relate to, as they may have, will have or are experiencing similar feelings and emotions. Therefore this creates sympathy and empathy towards the people on the documentary. One Born Every Minute also catches glimpse of amused husband, stressed women and some very happy moments in a couple’s life. But, this movie is inappropriate to be watched by children or as an entire family, as it contains some uncensored adult scenes and language, whereas the documentary Stalked can be watched by the whole family.

Throughout some of this documentary, there are places where the footage has been edited and appears for a longer pace of time, to allow us to see the emotions on faces of the new born babies, parents, nurses and midwives. As it slows right down you get a real picture of the reality behind the purpose of this documentary.

One Born Every Minute has been broadcasted with many episodes in one series, and within this many individuals have been recorded during their experiences, therefore this makes this a reliable, secure and accurate piece of work. Furthermore, it is quite representative as over the series and seasons many women have been recorded, in similar ways which makes this a representative sample to use within documentaries. However, this is only representative of a small scale not a rather large one, but it is because not many hospitals will allow recording of such events, whereas some may argue that filming in this case is incorrect due to ethical reasons and beliefs. This documentary does not go into too much depth, but it does sketch a rough outline of the work patterns, problems, solutions and difficulties, midwives and nurses overcome, throughout their daily basis.

Similarly, it is not bias because it is only revealing the truth, there is no hidden story behind any of this, and therefore the information provided is accurate and correct. It reveals and shows both sides from mothers and fathers to the experience of midwives and nurses; showing how relationships bond within the workplace. There is also a lot of realism within this documentary as it captures scares, happiness, anxiety and arguments, all happening within the hospital yard and presents it to us. This in fact tells us that not everything works smoothly, during pregnancies, but yet there is a solution, hence supporting my statement about this documentary as not bias.

Archival footage has also been used within a vast majority of the episodes within this documentary series, of how mothers and fathers experience childbirth and to how their feelings remain about it after. This footage shows us the pregnancy procedures of not one, but of a few women in one episode, and how their lives are after. The audience is kept engaged and interested in the documentary, as the camera switches between different mothers, who are experiencing similar situations.

Summary of One Born Every Minute

One Born Every Minute is a positive outlook on everyday experiences, which women face. Facts say that there are 267 born every minute, worldwide, that is 384 thousand born every day and 140.4 billion children born every year. Therefore this is a slightly small sample which challenges the representativeness of this documentary, however this documentary is completely valid as it is not bias, it works through any practical, ethical and theoretical issues before the broadcasting, which means the data is most likely to be very accurate. It is an intensive and information documentary, which can also be used as an education tool for first-time mothers. Overall, this is a very appealing documentary and it complies with most of the codes and conventions of a good documentary.

Similarities and Differences of Both Documentaries
Key


Differences

Similarities



 

Stalked

One Born Every Minute

Audience

Can be anyone and can be watched with the whole family. However some scenes may not appeal to young children.

Pregnant women, fathers-to-be, or women who are planning a family. Can also be watched by mature adults, as it contains adult scenes and language, not suitable for young children.

Purpose

To entertain people and to make them aware of cases like stalking, that exists.

Create a sense of feeling and belonging, for those that have or are experiencing similar issues.

To give an insight into the experience and things women go through during childbirth.

Educate other women, who may be considering of making a family.

Actuality

Very real, there has also been similar cases reported to the police and news therefore it’s very believable.

The victim within the documentary is a known journalist.

Very representative as there have been recordings of many similar situations and is also a genuine part of life, therefore real to believe.

Accuracy

Partially accurate, as there are not both sides of the story, therefore causes it to be bias. However, had it showed the other side of the story, it would have been more accurate.

Only shows one real example, not a lot of experts to support the claims and statements made.

Very accurate. A lot of people are aware of these types of experiences and there have been a lot of recordings and footage to show that the programme is not based on one women’s experience.

Objectivity/Subjectivity

Subjective.

Objective.

Opinion

Includes people’s opinions, emotions, feelings and experiences. Tries to create a real life picture, to show what really happened. This happens through reconstruction.

Includes opinions, interviews both from experts and individuals.

Archival footage taken before hand and then footage of couple’s after the pregnancies, talking about their whole practice.

Access

No need for access, however during the reconstruction access must have been granted to shoot in pubs, police stations, homes etc and also of any actors used within the reconstructions.

100% access was granted.

Access permitted by the hospital and staff.

Consent was given by participants, before recording and broadcasting.


Contract With The Viewer

Appeals a lot to the specific target audience, the montage of the documentary drags the audience in, and tempts them to watch it.

Appeals a lot to the specific target audience, the montage of the documentary drags the audience in, and tempts them to watch it.


Thursday, 3 January 2013

LO1: Issues Relating To Factual Programming For Television

Henna Ashraf
Unit 27 Factual Programming for Television

Issues that have to be covered, when producing a factual programming for television, are accuracy, balance, subjectivity or objectivity, representation, bias, impartiality, opinion, access, privacy and contract with the viewer. Following from this, I will be explaining the definition of these above-mentioned vocabularies and will give an example of each.

Within the production of television programming, accuracy of information is a vital aspect. A programme has to be accurate so that it can be broadcasted on television otherwise it will be rejected from being aired. The correct definition of accuracy is the condition or quality of being correct and free from errors. In factual programmes, like the news it is very important that the reporters give correct and accurate information, otherwise people will begin to lose faith in them and they would lose credibility.

Whereas, balance, on the other hand can be defined as the equilibrium of a product; how much truth it contains and how fair and neutral it is. Balance is required so that the audience can see both sides of a story, and in the end make their own decision and decide which they want to believe and which they don’t. Unbalanced programmes are unlikely to be broadcasted on television, as they can be quiet misleading.

Subjectivity is defined as the belonging to the thinking subject, rather than the object of thought. Things that can be regarded as subjective are people’s own opinions, moods and attitudes. Programs can be subjective if they portray only the individuals’ thoughts about an event, rather than looking at the wider context with an open mind.

On the other hand, objectivity means the opposite of subjective.  This means that the production team has not put their mind, interests, and opinions towards or within the product and hence it is an overall view, which is not affected by the individuals’ thought of mind.

Representation is action or speech on behalf of a person, group, business and community etc. In other words, this can also be described as how an individual or group is presented to us. Some examples of media representation are; class, gender, age, sexuality and more so. However, stereotypes and labelling comes under the influence of media upon us. The media represents youths as thugs in hoodies, children and oldies as vulnerable and so forth.

Another issue in factual programming is bias. Bias means to be prejudice, favouring something over another, in a usually unfair manner. A bias factual programming is a one-sided decision, whereas impartiality is the complete opposite of bias. Showing impartiality within factual programming for television is considered to be fair and just; from a balanced objective viewpoint.

Opinion is also used within factual programming, such as documentaries. This is a view of judgment about something, not necessarily being based on facts or knowledge. This is usually a personal view of a matter or belief about a particular thing however the same set of values can be interpreted differently. 

Access and privacy more or less can be discussed as a single issue. Access is the means of approaching or entering a place, to observe. This has to be granted from the gatekeeper with their consent; however the observation and participation can be overt or covert. Privacy, on the other hand, is the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people and away from public attention. Access allows individual to observe peoples private, professional and social life.

A final issue which is related to factual programming on television is the contract with the viewer. Contract with the viewer refers to an agreement with the audience. Programmes usually have to be able to show great persuasion, in order to attract a large audience; however this can only be done if the impact of the opening of the programming has a great impact. The level of impact caused is referred to  as, the contract with the viewer.

Issue
Big Fat Gypsy Wedding
News Night
The Worlds Strictest Parents
Accuracy
Yes. It goes into the real lives of gypsies, looking into their lifestyle, being it all real, it has to be accurate. Each episode it looks at gypsies, from different places around the world and how they all live; respecting the fact that like us, they all live differently too.
Yes. The information given to us by News Night has to be correct or it will cause controversy and also because if it is untrue and inaccurate, then people will stop believing what is being told to them. This is the only good source of means to know what is happening in the world around us and has to be accurate.
Very accurate. This factual programming on television contains the true lives of people hence it has to be accurate and is not misleading. However, like always we cannot be sure about the real behaviours of people, but sometimes during longitudinal studies the reality is revealed, increasing the levels of accuracy. It is quite difficult for people to hide their true nature for too long.
Balance
Yes. As this is a documentary based on people’s real lifestyle, it is most likely to contain almost truth and therefore it is very unlikely for the information displayed to us being false or not an honest picture. If this was the case, there would be a lot of problems with the media and society and hence I believe it is balanced.
Yes. This is a balance piece of programming as it portrays the truth only, however it can be argued that it does exaggerate on a lot of the matters. Nevertheless, it has a balanced statement.
Yes. It shows two different types of families and each episode is different to the previous, which shows different peoples living formats. My Worlds Strictest Parents usually has a split, where during half the episode half of a family is shown and the other half, another family, but this is merged together, rather than distinctive.
Subjective/
Objective
Objective. Big Fat Gypsy Weddings is an objective programme, as this only looks at the picture as a whole, however at times the production team tend to be quiet subjective towards this issue, as they only show us the things which will create an image/ stereotype of gypsies, which means that the programme has been subjectively filmed.
Both. The news itself is generally objective, however the views of people and their experiences makes this programming subjective too. Nevertheless, it can be argued that majority of the time it is objective, and interviews are shown to get a truer picture and therefore the means of it are not subjective.
Objective. It shows the reality of how people have lives, the producers choice hasn’t affected what is being showed by is; the production has been made with an open mind, to allow us to see the differences between the types of families and parents.
Representation
Average representation. This is because as we see, in each episode a single person, sometimes a group has been recorded, which makes this unrepresented of the wider society of gypsies. Perhaps what we see in one particular episode is not what other gypsies go through too. Therefore, sometimes it may be under represented. Also, we see gypsy girls in adult situations; e.g. dress sense, levels of maturity/immaturity and this creates a stereotype of label, by the public. There are occasions, where we judge then negatively, because their culture and lifestyle is different to ours and because we know that they have a stronger religious ethic and hence see some things as wrong or inappropriate.
Representative. The media shows people as they are, despite sometimes creating stereotypes but that is usually not the case because they are open to critical opinions and therefore must be as true as they can. Nevertheless, it is representative with its information and at time can be more representative than others, for examples, when the riots took place. During the rioting moments, a lot of youth were portrayed as mischievous, alongside adults and therefore it levels it out.
Representative. On this programme, we as an audience are able to see people’s lifestyle and cultures and are able to learn from it. This programme also fails to stereotype people, which is a good thing, as it would influence our though of mind and see it from a different perspective. Each week different families are shown, which makes it representative of the population too and isn’t generalisable.
Bias/Impartial
Mainly impartial. A vast majority of the time we see gypsies as being themselves, however sometimes media coverage throws in subjective comments and views which perhaps tilts the ball then, and we no longer see them as we should.
Bias. It gives one side of the story, usually the side of which they have been asked to write and talk about. Therefore the favour of information being transmitted to us is bias.
Impartial. We are able to see what people see and do; it is recorded with an open mind and isn’t a prejudice documentary. We are able to compare and contrast the similarities and differences between the families ourselves; the production team don’t influence our thoughts. We are left to decide and interpret it as we want.
Opinion
A lot of opinion. During the episodes of this programme, we are able to see how, what and why the gypsies portray themselves as they are which clears the air for most people. It concentrates on their emotions, feelings and views towards society and other aspects too.
Yes. The news is heavily opinion based, as it reflects the reality of the present and past. It expresses people’s opinions towards a particular issue that is making the headlines at the current time.
Yes. It is opinionated because individuals give their views on their belief system and culture, and we should respect that different families hold different customs and beliefs and that we are not all the same.
Access/
Privacy
Access has been given to allow the production team to be able to observe and record the private lives of the Gypsies. In one episode, access to nightclubs had been granted, as this is where the gypsy girls have visited. Therefore this is a very open environment and the production team hasn’t secretly filmed.
Access is usually granted to big channels like the BBC and ITV, to record things however there are some places and times where this access is restricted. For example, access is not given to film in courtrooms, but artists are allow to take notes and drawings, which still allows them to access the information, but information is limited.
Access from the families being recorded have been given, however access might be restricted to certain things. For example, producers may have the access to film at people’s homes, but not necessarily at places of worship etc.
Contract With The Viewer
Yes. This programme has been successful, as it has managed to attract a lot of viewers, whether it is for entertainment or educational purposes. But this programme has given society a better insight into gypsy’s lifestyle and has brought out a better view than we could have thought.
Mostly. The news is a factual programming which brings together stories and information of different types and some are more appealing and interesting than others. For example, news related to education, government and so forth are noted more seriously than others and therefore, there are peak times where the news will be watched/seen/ or brought than other times. Also, the news is more commonly read or watched by adults and the elderly, rather than children and teenagers.
Sometimes. This documentary appeals to people sometimes not always. This is because, people are attracted to watch this from the commercial ads beforehand. However, if people do not see elements such as truth, anger, emotion and more so, they are less likely to watch it. This is because it is out of their preference and might be rather boring. However the episodes which contain that more likely to be watched by a larger audience, for entertainment purposes.